(Disclaimer: Some articles and links to articles published in this ezine may contain false doctrine. They are included due to some valuable content. The fact that they are printed here does not mean that we accept or endorse their doctrine. All writings of men, including ours, should be carefully compared to the New Testament writings.)




Visit the website of the Piedmont (Alabama) church of Christ, where you will find myriad links to valuable Bible study aids, plus free Bible Study Courses, via mail or online: www.piedmontcoc.org.

One unique aspect of the Bible is that the inspired writers pointed out the weak characteristics as well as the strong in various individuals. It is revealed that Peter, a pillar of the early church, denied the Lord (Matthew 27:69-75). David, a man after God’s own heart, committed adultery and had a man killed (2 Samuel 11:1-5, 14-21). Even the great man of faith, Abraham, spoke a falsehood regarding his wife Sarah (Genesis 12:13). Thus it is not strange that the Holy Scriptures reveal to us the faults of Eli, a high priest of God, as well as his good points. Let us now consider the positive side and strengths of this great man.

First of all, Eli was a descendant of Aaron through Ithamar, the youngest of his sons (compare Leviticus 10:1, 2, 12 with I Kings 2:27; 2 Samuel 8:17 and I Chronicles 24:3). He was the first of the line of Ithamar who held the office of high priest. Besides being a high priest he was also a judge. In this capacity he judged Israel for forty years (I Samuel 4:18). He took a genuine interest in the training of the young boy Samuel. It was Eli who told Hannah that her petition for a male child had been granted by the Lord God (I Samuel 1:17). His submissive attitude toward the judgment of God against him must also be noted. When informed by Samuel he simply stated, “It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him” (I Samuel 3:18). In so many ways Eli was a very good man; however, there was an area in which he as a failure and that was as a father.

The sons of Eli Hophni and Phinehas brought shame and ruin to their father and sin to a degenerate priesthood. They knew not the Lord (I Samuel 2:12). Legally they had the right to take a portion of meat from the people but they went beyond this and even extracted meat which was to be offered as a sacrifice to God (See Leviticus 7:31-35; 8:31; II Chronicles 35:13). Their legal due as priests was the right shoulder and the wave breast, consecrated to God by the burning of fat upon the altar (Leviticus 3:5; 7:31, 34). Such action by these sons of Eli distressed the people. Their sin was flagrant and vile, calculated to awaken the intense disgust and abhorrence of every pure and reverent mind. They were the basest of sinners in that they, as priests, committed adultery with the women who served in the house of God (I Samuel 2:22). In their sinful ways, they encouraged others to do the same (I Samuel 2:24).

Eli was a failure as a father. The primary responsibility of rearing children in the way of the Lord is in the home. Actually, Paul places the duty on the shoulders of the father who is the head of the home (Ephesians 6:4). A great fault today is that many fathers do not fulfill this obligation. Children often associate with evil companions who influence them in a worldly and sinful manner (I Corinthians 15:33). Eli’s sons were not strong enough to counteract the evil tendencies of the age and their father erred in not taking pre-cautions adequate to the occasion. Many children of good men sometimes become godless because of the absorption of parents in public affairs and business. Children learn more of Christianity from what they observe of their parents probably more than any other source. On the other hand there is no greater encouragement for a child to despise Christianity than a discovery of insincerity and hypocrisy in the lives of their parents.

An outstanding weakness of Eli was that while knowing the sins of his sons he did not restrain them (I Samuel 3:13). A man may possess many amiable qualities and be on the whole a good man and yet be mocked by some defect which mars his character, prevents his usefulness, and makes him the unintentional cause of much mischief. Eli’s reproof was not administered in proper time. Early childhood is the time to teach and to train. A little plant may be easily rooted up but when it has grown into a tree it can only be removed by extraordinary efforts. Eli was weak, gentle and easy-going. He should have disciplined his sons before it became impossible to do so. It was said of Adonijah, the son of Haggith, that “his father had not rebuked him at any time by saying, “Why have you done so” (I Kings 1:6)? It would seem that the reproof Eli gave his sons was not given with sufficient earnestness. After learning of their terrible sins, he said to them, “Why do you do such things? For I hear of your evil dealings from all the people. “No, my sons! For it is not a good report that I hear. You make the Lord’s people transgress” (I Samuel 2:23, 24). His reproof was not pointed enough and specific. It was too general and in indefinite terms, just those things he had heard that his sons had done. There seemed to be no real sufficient determination to correct the evil ways of Hophni and Phinehas. Someone has said, “Indulgence never produces gratitude or love in the heart of a child.”

Another observation of the reproof given by Eli was that it was not followed by adequate chastisement. It was specifically stated that his sons “did not heed the voice of their father…” (I Samuel 2:25). The Law of Moses in the case of disobedient children was very severe (Deuteronomy 21:18-21). Eli seemingly made no effort to prevent the continuance of their evil ways. Eli as a father, high priest, and judge was guilty of disobedience (I Samuel 3:13). Hophni and Phinehas were hardened in heart and rebellious in spirit. Solomon wrote that “Harsh discipline is for him who forsakes the way, And he who hates correction will die” (Proverbs 15:10).

The ultimate end for Eli and his sons is recorded in I Samuel 4:10-18. Hophni and Phinehas were killed in battle. Eli being an old man fell and broke his neck and died when he heard about their deaths. Also the ark of God was taken by the Philistines. There was shame, degradation and ruin for all. Eventually the priesthood was taken away from the house of Eli (I Samuel 2:27-31; I Kings 2:27).

Parents can save themselves from many heartaches and sorrows in later life by following God’s instruction to bring up their children in the way of the Lord. May God abundantly and richly bless all those parents who are endeavoring to this very thing in this crooked and perverse generation.

"Of every ten persons who talk about you, nine will say something bad, and the tenth will say something good in a bad way." --Antoine Rivarol

"Slander is the revenge of a coward, and dissimulation of his defense." --Samuel Johnson

When preachers preach on first principles but fail to preach on moral issues, they are preaching some, but not the sum of God's Word. When preachers preach on the love, grace, and mercy of God, while never bothering to mention His holiness and severity (Rom. 11:22), they are preaching some of God's Word but not the sum of God's Word. Likewise, when preacher's focus exclusively on "doctrinal" preaching while failing to address the subjects of brotherly love, grief, overcoming discouragement, joy in Christ, security in Christ and forgiveness, etc., they are preachers of some of God's Word, but not the sum of God's Word. And finally, when Church leaders muzzle the preacher from preaching on certain controversial issues they are showing respect for some of God's Word, but not the sum of God's Word.

Paul did not shrink from declaring the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27; 2 Tim. 4:2-4). We are to do no less! Are you embracing just some of the Word, or the sum of God's Word? (BJ Clarke)

KneEmail: "The sum of your word is truth; and every one of your righteous rules endures forever" (Psm. 119:160 ESV).

Genesis 4:23-24 when studied only from the King James Version offers much mystery. And when you read the other versions, some of them shed more light on the subject but it remains an intriguing passage. Many scholars feel that there is a portion of the conversation missing, and that is possibly correct.

Being an avid lover of the King James Version, there were many years that I simply thought that he had killed a man, probably during a fight, and therefore was in sore danger of retaliation of the dead man's relatives.

But by reading several other translations, it becomes obvious that he is defending his actions to his wives and also attempting to assure them that they need not worry. Some versions make it appear that he actually killed 2 men, but I believe that to be inaccurate. He merely repeats the phrase in two different ways similarly to the first sentence in verse 23, where he calls his wives attention to what he is about to tell them, in two ways.

As we all know, many versions are commentaries rather than translations, yet one which obviously changes it into an understandable sentence, The New Living Translation, just may have it correctly explained. Here is how it reads: "One day Lamech said to Adah and Zillah, "Listen to me, my wives. I have killed a youth who attacked and wounded me. If anyone who kills Cain is to be punished seven times, anyone who takes revenge against me will be punished seventy-seven times!"

One must approach these ultra modern versions with suspicion, but when read judiciously they can often be of help in understanding otherwise difficult passages. But, be careful.

SALE ENDS MAY 31

An abandonment of orphans
An absence of waiters
An accompaniment of condiments
An addition of mathematicians
An amble of walkers
An anvil of blacksmiths
A bill of particulars